Artificial Blood Kills, But New Trial is Pitched As a Success

In yet another example of pharmaceutical hubris,blood). These were patients whose condition was not
Biopure has ballyhooed a study it financed, claiming itbeing adequately helped by HBOC. Thus, the goal of
shows that their product is successful and safe.the study was to limit the percentage of cases in
Reading the study itself, though, shows a completelywhich PRBC was required. Success was defined as
different result:avoiding PRBC infusion in 35% of subjects. The study
- The death rate was 1-2/3 times higher in thosereports that over 50% of the HBOC group were able
who received artificial blood.to avoid PRBC infusions. This is the basis of the claim
- Adverse events were 1-1/2 times higher in thosefor success.
who received artificial blood.Subjects deemed to require a transfusion were given
- Serious adverse events were 1-2/5 times higher ineither HBOC or PRBC by randomization. Some
those who received artificial blood.patients who were started on HBOC were later
- Double the number of heart attacks occurred inswitched to PRBC "based on the investigator's
those who received artificial blood.assessment of clinical need," according to the study.
The number of strokes cannot be given a statisticalHow this determination was made was not discussed,
outcome, because six people who received artificialthough it was claimed that "contemporary transfusion
blood had strokes, while there were no strokes inprocess" was adhered to.
the control group. Are your eyes spinning? Is yourEach of the two groups of subjects were divided
mouth hanging open in shock? Do you think thereinto two more groups. Those who were given HBOC
must have been a misprint? Is it possible that 1-2/3(artificial blood) were divided according to whether
more deaths, double the number of heart attacks, anthey were switched to PRBC. Those who were
infinitely higher rate of strokes, and more adversegiven PRBC only were divided according to whether
events can be considered successful?they were given two or fewer units of blood or
The answer, when you're a pharmaceuticalthree or more units.
corporation trying to make profits, is an unequivocalSubjects who were started on HBOC and never
yes. Biopure is trying to get Hemopure, areceived PRBC were considered moderate risk.
hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier (HBOC) intended toThose who were started on PRBC and received
replace blood in transfusions, approved for sale. Tofewer than three units were also considered
this end, on June 10th, it produced a press releasemoderate risk. Those who were started on HBOC
quoting the company's medical vice president, Dr. A.and switched to PRBC were considered high risk.
Gerson Greenburg, as saying, "It is gratifying to haveThose who were started on PRBC and received
experts cull through the complex data repeatedly untilthree or more units were considered high risk.
insight into our product emerged."Several markers for health were tracked in the
If you translate that statement, what you have is asubjects. These include creatinine, hemoglobin levels,
claim that even the worst results can be ignored insystolic blood pressure, lipase, and liver function tests.
favor of a carefully defined definition of success thatThere was discussion about whether adverse events
fits a small portion of the data.were associated with various test results. HBOC had
Metastudy of Artificial Blooda negative impact on all these markers. Positive or
Charles Natanson of the National Institutes of Healthnegative, they do not have any bearing on the claim
led a metastudy documenting increased deaths fromof efficacy for Biopure's artificial blood, though they
all artificial blood products. Biopure complained, claimingmay be indicative of why there were so many more
that it was a "poorly constructed meta-analysisadverse events with it.
predicated on the hypothesis of an increasedResults
mortality".Results from the four groups were discussed
The author, A. Gerson Greenburg, MD, Vice Presidentextensively in the study report. The study stated
of Medical Affairs, further stated, "In my opinion, itthat nearly all of the negative results were in the high
would be in the best interest of science and the fieldrisk groups. This is hardly surprising, especially in light
that both publications be formally retracted from theof the fact that the results of the study determined
literature and an apology issued for being inaccurate,which subjects were classed as high risk.
erroneous, incorrect, improper and unjust." StrongBeing switched from HBOC to PRBC, or being given
words!more than two transfusions in those started on
Biopure sent out notices of a new trial of theirPRBC, were the only determinants of high risk
artificial blood product, Hemopure. They quicklyclassification. There is no way to identify high risk,
blanketed the online finance world with notificationsother than by treatment. Thus, this separation into
of it and claims of both its efficacy and safety. Thesmaller groups accomplishes nothing but obfuscation.
same article, word-for-word, appeared on sites allThe authors identified those at greatest risk as being
over the 'net.over age 80. They make this claim based on 43% of
I read and carefully reviewed the study itself.cardiac severe adverse events and half of the
Biopure's claims and the study's results are wildlydeaths being in this group, though they are only 9%
different.of the total number of subjects. While this is
Conflicts of Interestinteresting, it does not include all adverse events.
The study, "HBOC-201 as an Alternative to BloodWere those who suffered strokes the same age, or
Transfusion: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in awere they, perhaps, two decades younger? That
Multicenter Phase III Trial in Elective Orthopedicinformation is not provided. So, very little can be
Surgery" was published in the June issue of theconcluded about the relative risk of artificial blood
Journal of Trauma. (HBOC is an acronym forbased on age.
hemoglobin based oxygen carrier.)Yes, it's interesting that 43% of severe cardiac
One of the authors is Greenburg, Biopure's medicalevents were among people over age 80. However,
vice president. The lead author is Jonathan S. Jahr,the ages of the rest of the subjects who suffered
MD. As a stockholder in Biopure, Jahr has a financialfrom cardiac events is not noted. Neither are the
interest in the results of the study. He has previouslyages of the stroke victims given. Nor the ages
published a study that withheld data showingassociated with any other adverse events. In fact,
negative results.what is most notable here is the lack of information
In 2004, a lawsuit was filed against Biopure forprovided.
misleading investors for misrepresenting Hemopure'sThe authors state:
safety after it knew that the FDA had misgivings"There are a number of physiologic effects of
about it. They settled out of court. Several otherHBOC-201 that are known and expected for this
class action suits have been filed against Biopure.class of drugs...removal of these expected AEs
How can results like these be reported as successful?[adverse events] reduced the difference between
Different techniques were used to obfuscate thematching groups...and clearly accounted for the
recent trial's results:majority of the differences between groups."
- Implying that, because it was already known thatFrom a patient's point of view--and, one would hope,
the product causes certain adverse events, thenthat of a doctor--the fact that adverse events are
those particular effects could be ignored as notknown to occur in a class of drugs does not eliminate
relevant.them from concern.
- Specifying success as avoidance of real bloodThe authors blame over and under treatment for a
transfusion in a certain percentage of cases, ignoringlarge portion of adverse events. What determines
negative results in patients.whether a patient has been over or under treated is
- Identifying the subset of patients with the worstnot defined, making it a questionable piece of
results and placing the blame on their characteristics.information.
Study MethodologyThe authors show a significant decrease in the use
The Subjectsof their artificial blood product. They don't, though,
Orthopedic patients having a wide range of surgeriesstate what basis, other than "contemporary
were used in the study of Biopure's HBOC were thetransfusion process" was used to determine when or
subjects. There were 693 subjects in 46 locationswhy real blood needed to be used instead.
around the world, including the US, Europe, Canada,Implications
and South Africa. 350 were in the HBOC (artificialIf those who are at high risk could be identified
blood) group, and 338 were in the packed red bloodbefore being subjected to artificial blood, then the
cell (PRBC) control group. Types of surgery were allstudy might be considered successful. However, the
related to the skeletal joint system. 304 of the HBOConly determinants for high risk were the results of
group and 282 of the PRBC group underwentthe study -- those who required a switch from HBOC
nonback surgery. 46 of the HBOC group and 48 ofto PRBC or those who required three or more units
the PRBC group underwent back surgery.of PRBC. So, the bottom line for any potential patient
The trial ran for six weeks. There was no long termis whether there is greater risk from artificial blood
follow-up.than real blood. The answer to that was quite clearly
Reasons for doing HBOC or PRBC infusions included:delineated by the study. Yes, severe risks, including
Heart rate over 100 beats per minutedeath, are greatly increased by Biopure's product,
- Low systolic blood pressureHemopure.
- Evidence of myocardial ischemia in an ECGNo amount of obfuscation or discussion of whether a
- Acidosispatient was medium or high risk changes that fact.
- Blood loss over 7 milliliters/kilogramFrom the point of view of most patients, success is
- Diminished urine output less than 0.5 millilitersnot measured by whether real blood transfusions are
kilogram/hour Weakness or dizzinessavoided. What counts is the likelihood of encountering
The Studyan adverse event, like heart attack or stroke, or
If certain criteria were met, those who had beendying. If that risk is greater with Biopure's product,
given HBOC (artificial blood) were given PRBC (realthen most patients will not want it used.