Better Brand Research: What Customers Want

Several years ago I came across one of the mostcommodity, these generic answers leave little room
useful and practical articles on market research Ifor new product developers to devise truly
have ever read -- "How To Turn Customer Input intoinnovative new products.
Innovation" by Anthony Ulwick.The reality is that customers have a hard time
Published in the January 2002 Harvard Businessarticulating why they do what they do and what will
Review, the article briefly outlined a methodology andmotivate them to buy a new product. Therefore,
set of tools for gathering customer input in a waytraditional research methods -- such as talking to
that actually drives product innovation. In addition, thecustomers about the solutions they want or can
article illustrated how Cordis -- a medical deviceenvision -- essentially ask them to act as product
manufacturer specializing in products for interventionaldevelopers and marketers, and that's a job most
vascular medicine -- used Ulwick's approach tocustomers are ill equipped to do.
innovate the heart stent and gain market leadershipHow do you gather customer input in a way that
in the angioplasty balloon market. As a result, Cordis'supports innovation?
stock went from $20 to $109 per share when it wasStart by silencing the literal voice of your customers.
acquired by Johnson and Johnson.In other words, suggests Ulwick, stop asking
Now, Ulwick has updated his tools and provided acustomers to tell you how and what to innovate.
more comprehensive look at his methodology in hisInstead:
recently released book, What Customers Want*Focus on the jobs your customers need to get
McGraw Hill). This book should be required readyingdone
for anyone involved in product development and*Work to uncover measurable outcomes your
marketing. Partly because it offers a comprehensive,customers hope to achieve
step-by-step approach for converting innovation from*Isolate important customer constraints
a random hit-or-miss process into a more methodicalBy directing your research towards these key areas,
approach, but also because it greatly reduces the riskyou will make more appropriate and better-informed
of new product failure and substantially increases thedecisions about what represents meaningful
odds of success.innovation for your customers.
In a world where some 80 to 90 percent of newA Good Investment
products fail, the ROI for using Ulwick's methods isFor me, the best and most practical part of the book
substantial.lies in Ulwick's eight-step approach, which dramatically
New Solution to an Old Problemimproves every aspect of the innovation process
According to Ulwick, most customer researchfrom segmenting markets and identifying
provides little real value to the companies conductingopportunities to creating, evaluating and marketing
it. Worse, it often misinforms their decisions andbreakthrough product ideas.
steers them in the wrong direction.Drawing on more than 200 complete studies, Ulwick
Why? Because the methods most companies use toloads his book with real life examples that bring
gather customer input are inherently flawed. In fact,meaning and insight to the process and make it easy
Ulwick argues that faulty research methodsto translate his principles to companies of all shapes
represent both the source and the cause of mostand sizes.
new product failures. Based on my own experience, IFor less than $20 and a few hours of reading time,
tend to agree.What Customers Want delivers a remarkable return
Traditional qualitative research methods askon investment. A can't-miss formula that delivers real
customers to define their needs, benefits,innovation that your customers will value, it just
specifications and solutions. However, the mostmight ensure that your next new product
frequent responses to questions about productintroduction hits the target in regards to the jobs
improvements focus mainly on "better quality" andyour customers need help with and delivers
"lower price." Besides indicating that the productmeasurable improvements to their most important
category under question might be perceived as aoutcomes.