Gummy Bear Or Cohesive Gel Vs Silicone Breast Implants

Breast Implant operations continue to be among thebeing looked at for wider use, but as with any other
top five most popular and requested plastic surgeriesmedical device approval process, this can take years
performed here in the United States. Not only hasfor them to go through for more popular use,
breast augmentation made leaps and bounds in theespecially when there are other viable alternatives
technological and technique aspect, but the cost hasavailable to those desiring breast augmentation.
also come considerably down from when they firstSo, what is the difference behind the cohesive gel
started to become popular and well known.aka gummy bear, and a regular silicone device? Well,
This procedure dates back to the 1950's believe it orthe term "cohesive" actually by virtue means that the
not, when the first pioneers went under the knifedescribed product maintains it's integrity and it's
and got the only type of implant available back then,shape, even when compromised. A good visual, and
which was the silicone variety. If you recall, muchone that you can find on the cohesive gel website, is
later in the nineties, the safety of silicone breastthe comparison to the gummy bear.
implants came under fire with numerous womenWhen the cohesive, or gummy bear implant, is cut in
saying they felt their health had been compromisedhalf, it maintains it's shape, just like a piece of gummy
after leakage into their body produced strangecandy does. It's soft and pliable, and yet it has that
symptoms that resembled auto immune or nervouscohesive nature that allows it to keep it's shape
system related side effects.when the outer shell is broken.
Because of the crusade of many consumer rightsThe key word here being "soft". That is why so
groups, silicone breast implants were banned frommany patients are curious about this type of
use in the United States for several years, onlytechnologically advanced material, because it is soft
recently making a comeback due to a re-approvallike silicone, and yet it maintains it's shape and
process and companies that manufacture the siliconeintegrity much better, and who knows, it may even
type of device improving their leakage likelihood byprove safer since it may be less likely to be leeched
reinforcing the shell encasing the silicone in a betterinto the blood stream if the implant is ever
way.compromised or a revision surgery is needed.
Up until they were approved again in the UnitedNow, how do they look? I took a look at many
States, women would have to travel over to Europepictures online that show before and afters of
or other far off places where they were still legal.patients who received the gummy implant, that I
Even now, silicone is not used by every surgeon, butmust say they look pretty good, but I couldn't tell a
it is increasingly easier to find one that will use thishuge difference between them and saline implants
type of device. While we may never know how trulyvisually.
safe this type of device is, it remains a popularOf course, I have never actually touched a breast
choice for women who want a more natural feel andthat is altered with the cohesive implant, so I don't
look, and some say it simply doesn't compare to theknow how they compare in softness and natural feel,
saline type when it comes to copying nature.bounce and movement, so I'd have to safely assume
Whatever you may believe, it's important to notethat this is where the bang for your buck comes in.
that you should always discuss the options with yourFeel and movement are really important when it
surgeon before you make any choices. Educatecomes to your breasts, so this does count for a lot
yourself on what you believe is the safest, mostfor most patients who are concerned with having
logical choice for yourself, and don't strictly let thestiff, unnatural feeling and motionless breasts.
vanity aspect guide you, but rather try to keep anNow on to the cost factor. Gummy bear implants
objective, open mind and don't let the manufacturer'scost significantly more than saline implants, and a fair
obvious skewed view get in the way. Instead try toamount more than saline implants, so that is definitely
read unbiased, objective reviews and descriptions bygoing to cause them not to be as widely used
women who've actually had them.whenever they do become popularized over here in
That said, let's talk about the newer options thatthe US, as they are in Europe currently.
patients have today when getting their breastsAnother few factors to consider about these nifty
enlarged via augmentation surgery. There is anotherimplant options is that they are not fillable, so they
option that is garnering a lot of interest on the webcan't be inserted as easily through small incisions like
as a possibility for wide future use here in the US,silicone and saline, since an empty shell is inserted and
but still for whatever reason is only mainly availablethen they are filled inside the chest. What this boils
through surgeons who are running clinical trials on thedown to is a larger incision to get the implant in.
implant. The implants I'm talking about are calledAlso, because they come pre-sized, you'd better
cohesive gel, or more widely known as "gummymake sure that is the size and shape you want your
bear" implants.breast to look like, otherwise, they are not really
Cohesive gel, or gummy bear, implants arechangeable after inserted into the chest unless the
manufactured by Mentor corporation, and they arepatient opts for another surgery to get new ones
named under the model Natrelle 410. They are stillimplanted.